按照《中国银监会办公厅关于2016年推进普惠金融发展工作的指导意见》，要认真落实小微企业______的无还本续贷政策，科学合理确定贷款分类。___

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于2016年推进普惠金融发展工作的指导意见》，商业银行要按照小微企业贷款增速不低于各项贷款平均增速的目标，年初单列______小微信贷计划。___

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于2016年推进普惠金融发展工作的指导意见》，确保小微企业信贷投放稳定增长，扩大小微企业金融服务覆盖面，力争实现小微企业贷款“______”目标。___

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于2016年推进普惠金融发展工作的指导意见》，对科技创新创业型小微企业，允许有条件的银行在依法合规、风险可控的前提下，试点探索______融资服务___

对符合并购贷款条件的兼并重组企业，并购交易价款中并购贷款所占比例上限可提高至 %。___

银行业金融机构应当及时协助公安机关办理返还。能够现场办理完毕的，应当现场办理；现场无法办理完毕的，应当在 个工作日内办理完毕。银行业金融机构应当将回执反馈公安机关。___

按比例返还的，公安机关应当发出公告，公告期为 日，公告期间内被害人、其他利害关系人可就返还冻结提出异议，公安机关依法进行审核。___

按照《中国银监会 公安部关于印发电信网络新型违法犯罪案件冻结资金返还若干规定的通知》的规定，银行业机构办理资金返还时，能够现场办理完毕的，应当现场办理；现场无法办理完毕的，应当在___个工作日内办理完毕。___

资金返还工作一般在立案 个月后启动。___

《返还规定》第十条中的“冻结银行”指冻结账户的归属行在冻结地公安机关所在的___分支机构。___

《返还规定》第六条第五款中的“如原银行账户无法接受返还”时，原则上应返还至___。___

按照《中国人民银行 中国银行业监督管理委员会关于加强票据业务监管 促进票据市场健康发展的通知》规定，银行应建立监督有力、制约有效的票据保管制度，严格执行票据实物清点交接登记、出入库制度，加强定期查账、查库，做到___，防范票据传递和保管风险。___

报告。___"

按照《中国人民银行 中国银行业监督管理委员会关于加强票据业务监管 促进票据市场健康发展的通知》规定，银行应加强对相关交易合同、增值税发票或普通发票的___审查___

按照《中国人民银行 中国银行业监督管理委员会关于加强票据业务监管 促进票据市场健康发展的通知》规定，票据凭证不能满足背书人记载项的需要，可以加附粘单；粘单上的第一记载人，应当在票据和粘单的粘接处签章。该第一记载人是___。___

按照《中国人民银行 中国银行业监督管理委员会关于加强票据业务监管 促进票据市场健康发展的通知》规定，对汇票的收款人承担保证汇票被承兑和付款责任的汇票当事人是___。___

按照《中国人民银行 中国银行业监督管理委员会关于加强票据业务监管 促进票据市场健康发展的通知》规定，一张汇票在承兑后，其债务人承担汇票付款责任的次序是___。___

按照《中国人民银行 中国银行业监督管理委员会关于加强票据业务监管 促进票据市场健康发展的通知》规定，背书人在汇票背面只有签字，不写被背书人名称，这是___。___

按照《中国人民银行 中国银行业监督管理委员会关于加强票据业务监管 促进票据市场健康发展的通知》规定，下列行为中正确的是___。___

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于进一步加强银行业诚信建设的通知》的规定，下列符合诚信建设要求的是___。___

按照《中国银监会办公厅关于进一步加强银行业诚信建设的通知》的规定，对于会机关作出的行政决定，相关部门应于季后___个工作日内将上季度官方网站公示的行政许可和行政处罚信息提交银监会社会信用体系建设归口管理部门。___

按照国家发展改革委办公厅关于印发《商业银行收费行为执法指南》的通知的规定，下列有利于规范收费行为的积极因素为___。___

按照《关于构建绿色金融体系的指导意见》的规定，绿色金融包括___。___

按照《关于构建绿色金融体系的指导意见》的规定，对于绿色信贷支持的项目，可按规定申请___。___

按照《关于构建绿色金融体系的指导意见》的规定，为贯彻构建绿色金融体系的要求，银行业机构在开展信贷资产质量压力测试时，应将___作为重要的影响因素。___

按照《关于金融支持服务贸易发展的指导意见》的规定，为贯彻金融业对外开放的要求，在加强监管的前提下，应积极推动具备条件的___依法发起设立中小银行与机构。___

金融机构应当尊重金融消费者的人格尊严和民族风俗习惯，不得因金融消费者性别、年龄、种族、＿＿＿或国籍等不同进行歧视性差别对待___

金融管理部门、金融机构、相关社会组织要加强研究，综合运用多种方式，推动金融消费者宣传教育工作深入开展。＿＿＿要将金融知识普及教育纳入国民教育体系，切实提高国民金融素养。___

银行业金融机构在办理个人住房贷款业务时，要以在房产管理部门备案的网签合同和住房套数查询结果作为审核依据，并以网签备案合同价款和房屋评估价的＿＿＿作为计算基数确定贷款额度___

购房款交款需现金支付的，当日现金交易单笔或者累计达到人民币5万元以上，应在交易发生之日＿＿＿个工作日内向中国反洗钱监测分析中心报送大额交易报告___

房地产开发企业、房地产中介机构要在销售房屋、提供经纪等相关服务时履行反洗钱义务，建立健全反洗钱内控制度体系，加强对高风险业务、客户的风险管控措施;妥善保存客户身份资料和交易记录，且保存期限不少于＿＿＿年___

稳妥有序推进投贷联动试点，试点银行要加快完善投贷联动业务内部管理制度和流程，积极支持＿＿＿发展。___

推动完善银行业金融机构股东管理制度，加强控股股东行为约束和＿＿＿监管，严禁控股股东不当干预银行业金融机构正常经营管理。___

《中国人民银行、工业和信息化部、银监会、证监会、保监会关于金融支持制造强国建设的指导意见》规定，探索为_____创新中心等公共服务平台提供创新型、多元化融资服务，支持关键共性技术研发和科技成果转化应用。___

《中国人民银行、工业和信息化部、银监会、证监会、保监会关于金融支持制造强国建设的指导意见》规定,_____要注重发挥管理半径短、经营机制灵活等优势，立足当地，服务中小，积极开发针对中小型制造业企业的特色化、专业化金融产品和服务。___

《中国人民银行、工业和信息化部、银监会、证监会、保监会关于金融支持制造强国建设的指导意见》规定，____要在重点领域和薄弱环节切实发挥引领作用，在业务范围内以财务可持续为前提，加大对重大项目、重大技术推广和重大装备应用的融资支持。___

《中国人民银行、工业和信息化部、银监会、证监会、保监会关于金融支持制造强国建设的指导意见》规定，____要积极发挥网络渠道、业务功能协同等优势，为制造业企业提供综合性金融服务，不断改进和提升对中小型制造业企业金融服务的质量效率。___

《中国人民银行、工业和信息化部、银监会、证监会、保监会关于金融支持制造强国建设的指导意见》规定,极发挥____优势，在符合保险资金运用安全性和收益性的前提下，通过债权、股权、基金、资产支持计划等多种形式，为制造业转型升级提供低成本稳定资金来源。___

按照《金融机构衍生产品交易业务管理暂行办法》，银行业金融机构不得自主持有或向客户销售可能出现无限损失的 衍生产品，以及以衍生产品为基础资产或挂钩指标的再衍生产品。___

按照《金融机构衍生产品交易业务管理暂行办法》，银行业金融机构应当每 一次对其自身衍生产品业务情况进行评估。___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___

大学生的成才目标是___。

现代人才素质的灵魂是___。

___是人才素质的基础.

世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。

在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可，统一存在的，其中处于主导地位的是___。

时代精神的内涵十分丰富，其中___居于核心地位。

民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。

下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。

___是人才素质的基本内容

10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想

衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___

独立生活意识指___

___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓，解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。

___是人才素质的综合体现.

人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___

人生观的核心是___

人的本质属性是___

社会主义社会人生价值标准是___

回答人为什么活着___

表明人应当怎样对待生活___

判别什么样的人生才有意义___

下列人生态度中正确的是___

下列属于正确的人生目的的是___

___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.

___ 认为，社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。

___认为，人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。

马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___

人与自然关系的实质是___

在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___

社会公德最基本的要求是___

通过其规定和实施，影响人们思想，培养和提高人们法律意识，引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___

有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___

一行人在过路口时迎面遇到红灯，看到近处没有车辆便径直通过。他这样做是___

任何一个社会成员，无论具有何种身份、职业和地位，都必须在公共生活中遵守社会公德。这体现了社会公德具有的___特点。

影响公共生活、公共秩序、文明礼貌、清洁卫生以及其他影响社会生活的最主要行为规范是___

《公民道德建设实施纲要》明确指出，社会公德涵盖了___

为调整和规范人类社会生活三大领域，相应分别形成了___