国家医保局、财政部在2019年5月印发通知，明确今年居民医保人均财政补助标准新增___。

中国慈善联合会在2019年5月11日发布___公约《中国慈善联合会会员公约》。

2019年5月9日，历时3年打造的“纪律建设永远在路上——中国共产党纪律建设历史陈列”展览在___革命博物馆开馆。

2019年5月10日，正值第三个中国品牌日，中国品牌___在上海举行。

2019年5月10日，中国公共外交协会与中日韩合作秘书处共同举办了2019年中日韩合作国际论坛，外交部发言人耿爽表示，中日韩三国应尽快结束区域全面经济伙伴关系协定谈判，同时加快中日韩___协定谈判，对外释三国坚持走开放之路的积极信号。

2019年5月10日，圆明园“___”项目正式启动。

5月12日电，国家医保局、财政部在2019年5月印发通知，明确今年居民医保人均财政补助标准新增___。

5月12日电，近日，国家医保局、财政部印发通知，要求将大病保险政策范围内报销比例由50%提高至___。

中国慈善联合会5月11日发布首个慈善领域全国性公约___。

下列我国古代国家行政机稀不具有行政监察能的是___。

5月13日电，近日印发的___提出，到2020年，试验区城镇空气质量优良天数比例保持在98%以上，确保海南省生态环境质量只能更好、不能变差。

2019年5月12日中国国民党前主席___率台湾各界人士代表团一行，开启五天四夜的北京参访行程。希望透过民间交流做两岸沟通交流的工作。

2019年5月9日，青岛举行的2019全球___大会，大会期间，青岛发布《打造（）中心若 干政策措施》。

2019年5月12日是我国第十一个全国防灾减灾日，主题为“___”。

2019年5月13日，中共中央政治局召开会议，决定从今年6月开始，在全党自上而下分两批开展“___”主题教育。

2019年5月13日，国务院关税税则委员会发布公告，自2019年6月1日0时起，对已实施加征关税的600亿美元清单美国商品中的部分，提高加征关税税率，分别实施___加征关税。对之前加征5%关税的税目商品，仍继续加征5%关税。

5月13日上午，在民航局的统一安排下，南航、东航、国航、厦航派出的4架大型民航客机先后降落在___国际机场，成功完成首次试飞任务。

北京大兴国际机场本期建设4条跑到，采用“___”至向构型，在中国国内尚属首次。

2019年5月15日上午，以“___”为主题的亚洲文明对话大会在北京开幕。

2019年5月15日习近平王席在业洲又明对话大会开养式上发表了___王旨演讲。

中共中央政治局2019年5月13日召开会议。会议指出，根据党的十九大部署，以___以上领导干部为重点，在会党开展“不忘初心，牢记使命”主题教育。

下列不属于我国国家机关的是___。

中国2019世界集邮展览定于2019年6月11日至17日在湖北武汉举行，这是我国举办的___世界集邮展，展览规模有望创世界邮展之最，并将首次集中展出新中国邮票“全家福”。

2019年5月15日，最高人民检察院第十检察厅下发通知，要求各级人民检察院办理自身作为赔偿义务机关的国家赔偿案件时，执行新的日赔偿标准___元。

2019年5月15日，韩国足协在其官网宣布，退出申办2023年亚洲杯足球赞。由于此前只有___和韩国确定申办2023年亚洲足球赛，这就意味着，_____承办该项赛事已几无悬念。

2019年5月15日电，世界知识产权组织发布的《2018全球创新指数报告》显示，中国排名第___位，较上年提升5位，首次跻身全球创新指数20强。

2019年5月15日，习近平出席亚洲文明对话大会开幕式，并发表题为《深化文明交流互鉴共建亚洲命运共同体》的主旨演讲。习近平指出，应对共同挑战、迈向美好未来，既需要___力量，也需要___力量。

2019年5月15日，习近平出席亚洲文明对话大会开幕式，并发表题为《深化文明交流互鉴共建亚洲命运共同体》的主旨演讲。习近平指出，希望各国互尊互信、和睦相处，广泛开展___的交往活动，共同维护比金子还珍贵的和平时光。

2019年5月16日，___全国自强模范暨助残先进表彰大会在京举行。中共中央总书记、国家主席、中央军委主席习近平在人民大会堂亲切会见太会代表，向他们表示热烈的祝贺，勉励他们再接再厉，为推进我国残疾人事业发展再立新功。

新华社北京5月16日电，近日，中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅近日印发___，并发出通知，要求各地区各部门结合实际认真贯彻落实。要求到2020年，全国行政村4G覆盖率超过98%，农村互联网普及率明显提升。

2019年5月17日23时48分，我国在西昌卫星发射中心用长征三号丙运载火箭，成功发射了第___北斗导航卫星。这是长征系列运载火箭的第304次飞行。

国家主席习近平在___开幕式上的主旨演讲《深化文明交流互鉴共建亚洲命运共同体》单行本，已由人民出版社出版，即日起在全国新华书店发行。

2019年5月17日，是第50个“世界电信和信息社会日”（简称“世界电信日”）。2019年被认为是“___”

2019年5月18日，国务委员兼外交长王毅应约同美国务卿蓬佩奥通电话，王毅重申了反对美国“___”的原则立场。

2019年5月18日电，国内首台80吨液氧甲烷火箭发动机一—“___”发动机（TQ-12）日前试车成功，这意味着我国民营航天力量首次掌握了百吨级液体火箭发动机关键技术并具备发动机研制所需的保障能力。

2019年5月16-18日，中国与联合国教科文组织合作举办的国际人工智能与教育大会将在北京召开。本次大会以“___”为主题。

2019年5月15日，习近平出席亚洲文明对话大会开幕式，并发表题为《深化文明交流互鉴共建亚洲命运共同体》的主旨演讲。习近平指出，___是中国文化一贯的处世之道，___是中华文明鲜明的价值导向，____是中华文明永恒的精神气质，道法自然、天人合一是中华文明内在的生存理念。

___中国中部投资贸易博览会5月18日在江西南昌开幕。数据显示，中国吸引外资不降反升。

2019年5月19日，文化和旅游部公布新一批4家国家级旅游度假区，分别是：四川成都天府青城康养休闲旅游度假区、广西桂林阳朔遇龙河旅游度假区、云南玉溪抚仙湖旅游度假区、广东河源巴伐利亚庄园。目前，国家级旅游度假区数量已增至___家。

5月20日电，这几天，___综合性国家科学中心的核心项目正在紧张建设。这里未来将与上海张江国家科学中心东西呼应，在大科学装置上各有侧重，在科技攻关上分工协作。

矛盾问题的精髓是___

题的方法都是___

“任何个别（无论怎样）都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___

在唯物辩证法看来，水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___

“是就是是，不是就是不是，除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___

真象和假象的区别在于___

有的哲学家说，在大风扬起的尘土中，每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___

“或然率”是指___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___

大学生的成才目标是___。

现代人才素质的灵魂是___。

___是人才素质的基础.

世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。

在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可，统一存在的，其中处于主导地位的是___。

时代精神的内涵十分丰富，其中___居于核心地位。

民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。

下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。

___是人才素质的基本内容

10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想

衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___

独立生活意识指___

___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓，解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。

___是人才素质的综合体现.

人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___

人生观的核心是___

人的本质属性是___

社会主义社会人生价值标准是___

回答人为什么活着___

表明人应当怎样对待生活___

判别什么样的人生才有意义___

下列人生态度中正确的是___

下列属于正确的人生目的的是___

___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.

___ 认为，社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。

___认为，人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。

马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___