《国家电网公司安全事故调查规程》（2017修正版）规定：公司系统外单位承包系统内工作，发生由系统内单位负同等以下责任的人身事故统计为外包事故。

《国家电网公司安全事故调查规程》（2017修正版）规定：同一个供电（输电）单位的几条线路或几个变电站，由于同一次自然灾害，如暴风、雷击、地震、洪水、泥石流等原因，发生多条线路、多个变电站跳闸停运时，可统计为一次事故。

《国家电网公司安全事故调查规程》（2017修正版）规定：公司系统各单位事故发生后，事故现场有关人员应当立即向本单位现场负责人报告。现场负责人接到报告后，应立即向本单位负责人报告。

根据《电力安全事故应急处置和调查处理条例》，事故造成电力设备、设施损坏的，有关电力企业应当立即开展事故调查，查明事故原因后，方可组织抢修。

在装配线上工作时，一名团队成员报告了产品的高失败率。项目经理应使用什么来支持这项证据？

在测试期间发现了多个产品缺陷，项目经理应使用下列哪项工具或技术为这些 缺陷排列优先顺序？

由于项目的最终产品不能满足技术规范要求，已提交六个变更请求，请求批准。 项目团队检查了记录，且所有过程都是按计划执行的。最初管理期望是整个项目 能够在少于三个变更请求的情况下完成。项目经理应该怎么做？

在漫长的延期后，生产线重新启动。若要核实产品是否仍然满足要求的技术规范，项目经理应该使用什么工具或技术？

一项新产品需要导致成本的广泛召回。若要降低召回几率，项目经理应该怎么做？

一家公司与一个客户签订了多个项目的合同。完成第一个项目时，客户对可交 付成果不满意，希望重新评价剩余项目。项目经理应该怎么做来满足对未来可交付成果的期望？

对一个实施项目的新软件进行测试时，两个部门认识到他们将需要调整操作程序。应使用哪一项工具或技术来完成这项工作？

在项目执行期间，项目团队发现一个供应商的可交付成果重复出现缺陷。项目经理应该怎么做？

项目经理认为员工的休息时间可能对质量控制部门的输出具有直接影响。项目经理应该使用什么工具或技术来研究和识别这个可能的关联？

在产品测试期间，项目团队识别到不满足技术规格要求的结果。分析数据确 定原因后，项目团队应怎么做？

客户要求生产 50000 台风扇，制造公司的项目经理正在制定质量管理计划。项目经理应使用下列哪一项来减少缺陷并让产品质量达到最大化？

项目实施后，项目干系人向项目经理报告缺陷超出阈值。若要避免这个问题， 项目经理应该事先做什么？

作为具有两个组件的新产品设计团队一员，一名团队成员负责评估与组件 B 有 关的质量问题。下列哪一项用来识别可能影响生产过程的因素？

项目经理正在审查供应商的变更请求，修改进入泵送设施的管径。这属于什 么类型的变更？

质量经理向项目经理提交了一份图表，显示 24 次系统故障是产品质量差的主 要原因。但该图表没有显示所有故障源的累积频率。 项目经理使用的是什么基本质量工具？

项目经理召开一次紧急团队会议，审查交付时由客户发现的最终产品问题。 审查所有测试结果后，确定需求收集过程定义不清，且未能加以遵循。 项目团队应该怎么做来改进未来的需求收集过程？

一项未计划的外部审计将在未来两周内执行。下列哪种说法准确地描述了这种情形？

在安装新软件期间，项目经理发现执行一项特定功能所需的时间不被客户接 受。项目经理收集了该功能时间的 10 个测量值；其中两个高于平均值，两个在 平均值上，五个低于平均值，还有一个大于建议的限值。 根据这些测量值，项目经理可以确定出该功能相关的什么结果？

项目经理正在为一个开发更强材料的项目工作。若要确定哪种成分将以合理 的成本生产出更强的材料，项目经理应该考虑哪一项？

项目的可交付成果必须遵守法律指导方针。为了确保满足这些标准，项目经 理为项目团队实施了有关这些指导方针的培训。 培训成本应归到下列哪一项？

在执行一个价值数百万美元的项目期间，项目团队遭遇到中间可交付成果高故障率，导致公司管理层十分担忧。项目经理应利用下列哪一项工具来识别这个问题的根本原因？

在项目实施期间发现多个缺陷，这对完成下一个里程碑造成风险。然而，应 急储备却未受影响。一些团队成员认为如果已经识别并解决主要问题，大部分缺陷将得到解决。接下来，项目经理应该使用下列哪一项工具？

随着项目临近完工，客户表达了对于已交付产品质量的担忧。什么方法将识 别质量问题的范围？

在一个生产线中，控制下限设为 301，控制上限设为 320，平均值设为 310。该过程在下列哪个系列中处于控制当中？

在一个软件开发项目中，项目经理确定执行满足产品质量要求所需的全面测 试是不可能的。项目经理应使用哪一项工具来识别哪些软件元素是大部分问题的主要原因？

最近在一个新产品中发现的缺陷数量上升。高级管理层非常担心，并要求项 目团队调查这个问题。若要确定根本原因，项目团队应使用什么工具？

项目团队报告同行评审过程存在无价值的活动。质量团队必须审查观察结果 并处理整体一致性。团队执行的是下列哪一项？

项目已完成 40%。若要提高团队生产力，改善流程的执行，项目经理应该开展下列哪一项？

在负责管理一个正在进行中的项目之后，项目经理确定支持项目的质量测量指标不足。项目经理下一步该怎么做？

项目经理通知可交付成果存在不一致性。应该使用什么工具来确保任务获得一致执行？

一家自行车公司发布了了一款拥有五年质保期的新车篮系列。材料能抵御极 端天气条件。产品广受客户接受，且视为是系列中的顶级产品。产品只有基本设计，无额外功能。 下列哪一项是该产品的描述？

在一个新系统实施项目的测试阶段后期，一名新项目经理接管。在用户测试 期间记录了数百个未解决的系统缺陷，而距离测试完成只剩两周时间了，开发团 队不可能解决所有问题。项目经理应该怎么做？

一个新软件产品已经做好准备按照进度计划进行市场交付。但是，未能按时完成多个关键过程的文档导致延期。若要控制这个问题，项目经理应该事先考虑哪一点？

一名新项目经理负责管理一个已经经历质量问题的项目。项目经理应使用什 么来控制这些质量问题？

一个项目接近完工时，客户发现一个重大系统故障。项目经理必须评估这对 项目的影响。这描述的是哪一项技术？

项目经理负责安装和调试一个新的生产设施。一条新的生产线已准备好调试， 且正在进行试生产。若要确保生产线的运行符合技术规范，项目经理应使用什么工具或技术？

揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___

“肯定和否定相互渗透，在一定意义上，肯定就是否定。”这是一种___

事物的否定方面是指___

作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___

辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___

否定之否定规律___

事物发展的周期性体现了___

直线论的错误在于只看到___

循环论的错误在于___

对立统一规律揭示了___

唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___

辩证法所说的矛盾是指___

矛盾的基本属性是___

依据是___

矛盾问题的精髓是___

题的方法都是___

“任何个别（无论怎样）都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___

在唯物辩证法看来，水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___

“是就是是，不是就是不是，除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___

真象和假象的区别在于___

有的哲学家说，在大风扬起的尘土中，每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___

“或然率”是指___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___

大学生的成才目标是___。

现代人才素质的灵魂是___。

___是人才素质的基础.

世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。

在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可，统一存在的，其中处于主导地位的是___。

时代精神的内涵十分丰富，其中___居于核心地位。

民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。

下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。

___是人才素质的基本内容

10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想

衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___

独立生活意识指___

___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓，解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。