“机不可失，时不再来”指的是___

是 ___

在客观规律面前，人的主观能动性表现在___

事物的联系和运动之间的关系___

唯物辩证法的总特征是___

___

“割下来的手就不再是人手”这句话体现了___

唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___

区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___

质量互变规律揭示了___

质和事物的存在是___

在实际工作中，要注意掌握分寸，防止“过”或“不及”，其关键在于___

区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___

量变的复杂性是指___

量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___

量变中的局部性部分质变是___

揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___

“肯定和否定相互渗透，在一定意义上，肯定就是否定。”这是一种___

事物的否定方面是指___

作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___

辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___

否定之否定规律___

事物发展的周期性体现了___

直线论的错误在于只看到___

循环论的错误在于___

对立统一规律揭示了___

唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___

辩证法所说的矛盾是指___

矛盾的基本属性是___

依据是___

矛盾问题的精髓是___

题的方法都是___

“任何个别（无论怎样）都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___

在唯物辩证法看来，水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___

“是就是是，不是就是不是，除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___

真象和假象的区别在于___

有的哲学家说，在大风扬起的尘土中，每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___

“或然率”是指___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___

我们把严明政治纪律，组织纪律作为重要任务，严肃查处有令不行、有禁不止的行为，在查办违纪案件中重点审查违反___的问题，坚决维护党的团结统一。

党员领导干部要做学习党章、遵守党章的模范。各级领导干部要把学习党章作为___，走上新的领导岗位的同志要把学习党章作为（D），带头遵守党章各项规定。

各级领导干部要带头依法办事，带头遵守法律，始终对宪法和法律保持敬畏之心，牢固确立___不能触碰，法律底线不能逾越的观念，不要去行使依法不该由自己行使的权利，更不能以言代法、以权压法、徇私枉法。

《习近平关于严明党的纪律和规矩论述摘编》强调，鱼和熊掌不可兼得，当官的就不要___，发财的就不要当官，这是两股道上的车。

党的最高理想和最终目标是实现___。

马克思列宁主义揭示了___，它的基本原理是正确的，具有强大的生命力。

在现阶段，我国社会的主要矛盾是___。

坚持社会主义道路、坚持人民民主专政、坚持___、坚持马克思列宁主义毛泽东思想这四项基本原则，是我们的立国之本。

中国共产党领导人民发展社会主义民主政治。坚持___、人民当家作主、依法治国有机统一，走中国特色社会主义政治发展道路。

要以改革创新精神全面推进党的建设新的伟大工程，以党的政治建设为纲领，全面推进党的思想建设、组织建设、作风建设、___、制度建设。

党章总纲强调，要全面提高党的建设___水平。

坚持解放思想，实事求是，与时俱进，___。党的思想路线是一切从实际出发，理论联系实际，实事求是，在实践中检验真理和发展真理。

“一切为了群众，一切依靠群众，从群众中来，到群众中去，把党的正确主张变为群众的自觉行动。”这是党章对___的表述。

中国共产党的最大政治优势是___。

中国共产党执政后的最大危险是___。

党的领导主要是___的领导。

在党组织讨论决定对党员的党纪处分或作出鉴定时，下列说法中，正确的应该是___。

当党员对党的决议和政策有不同意见时，下列说法中，正确的应该是___。

党的领导核心作用主要体现为:___。

党的各级委员会按照___、会议决定的原则决定重大事项。

在新的历史条件下，我们党面临着精神懈怠、能力不足、___、消极腐败“四大危险”。

不断提高党的领导水平和执政水平、提高___的能力，是党巩固执政地位、实现执政使命必须解决好的重大课题。

全面推进党的政治建设、思想建设、组织建设、作风建设、纪律建设、制度建设，增强___、自我完善、自我革新、自我提高能力。

党按照___的原则选拔干部。

党的思想路线是一切从实际出发，理论联系实际，___，在实践中检验真理和发展真理。

民主集中制是民主基础上的集中和集中指导下的民主相结合。它既是党的___，也是群众路线在党的生活中的运用。

预备党员的___同正式党员一样。

党是根据自己的___，按照民主集中制组织起来的统一整体。

凡是成立党的新组织，或是撤销党的原有组织，必须由___决定。

党员除了享有表决权、选举权和被选举权以外，还有权要求___或撤换不称职的干部。

《党章》规定，党员如果没有正当理由，连续___不参加党的组织生活，或不交纳党费，或不做党所分配的工作，就被认为是自行脱党。

《党章》规定，党员对党组织作出的处分决定不服，可以提出___，有关党组织必须负责处理或者迅速转递，不得扣压。

《党章》规定，党的纪律是党的___必须遵守的行为规则，是维护党的团结统一、完成党的任务的保证。

《党章》规定，党内严格禁止用违反___的手段对待党员，严格禁止打击报复和诬告陷害。违反这些规定的组织或个人必须受到党的纪律和国家法律的追究。

《党章》规定，党组织对党员作出处分决定，应当实事求是地查清事实。处分决定所依据的事实材料和处分决定___同本人见面，听取本人说明情况和申辩。

党的最高领导机关是___。

企业、农村、机关、学校、科研院所、街道社区、社会组织、人民解放军连队和其他基层单位，凡是有正式党员___人以上的，都应当成立党的基层组织。

“三会一课”制度的内容是___。

___负责军队中党的工作和政治工作，对军队中党的组织体制和机构作出规定。

党的各级领导干部必须模范地履行党员的各项义务，并且必须具备以下的基本条件___。