根据《关于新形势下党内政治生活的若干准则》规定，建设廉洁政治，坚决反对腐败，是我们党强身治病、保持肌体健康的锐利武器，也是加强和规范党内政治生活的重要手段。___

根据《关于新形势下党内政治生活的若干准则》规定，涉及全党全国性的重大方针政策问题，各部门各地方党组织和党员领导干部可以对外发表主张。___

根据《中国共产党问责条例》规定，问责对象对问责决定不服的，可以自收到问责决定之日起1个月内，向作出问责决定的党组织提出书面申诉。___

根据《中国共产党问责条例》规定，实行终身问责，对失职失责性质恶劣、后果严重的，不论其责任人是否调离转岗、提拔或者退休等，都应当严肃问责。___

根据《中国共产党问责条例》规定，对被立案审查的党组织、党的领导干部问责的，不再另行启动问责调查程序。___

根据《中国共产党问责条例》规定，正确对待被问责干部，对影响期满、表现好的干部，符合条件的，按照干部选拔任用有关规定正常使用。___

根据《中国共产党问责条例》规定，问责对象申诉期间，停止问责决定的执行。___

根据《中国共产党问责条例》规定，对同级党委管理的领导干部，纪委和党的工作机关报经同级党委或者其主要负责人批准，可以采取通报、批评教育方式进行问责。___

根据《中国共产党问责条例》规定，问责对象是党组织、党的领导干部___

根据《中国共产党问责条例》规定，对党组织问责的，无需同时对该党组织中负有责任的领导班子成员进行问责。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，对于严重违犯党的纪律、本身又不能纠正的党组织，上一级党的委员会在查明核实后，根据情节严重的程度，可以予以改组或解散。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，违反有关规定取得外国国籍或者获取国（境）外永久居留资格、长期居留许可的，给予严重警告处分。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，主动交代是指涉嫌违纪的党员在组织初核后向有关组织交代自己的问题，或者在初核和立案审查其问题期间交代组织未掌握的问题。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，加重处分是指违纪行为应当受到的处分幅度以外，加重一档给予处分。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，借机敛财或者有其他侵犯国家、集体和人民利益行为的，从重或者加重处分，直至开除党籍。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，预备党员违犯党纪，情节较轻，可以保留预备党员资格的，党组织应当对其批评教育或者延长预备期；情节较重的，应当取消其预备党员资格。___

未经组织批准参加其他集会、游行、示威等活动，情节严重的，给予撤销党内职务或者留党察看处分。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，撤销党内职务处分，是指撤销受处分党员由党内选举或者组织任命的党内职务。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，在组织核实、立案审查过程中，能够配合核实审查工作，如实说明本人违纪违法事实的，可以从轻或者减轻处分。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，党员领导干部违反工作、生活保障制度，在交通、医疗、警卫等方面为本人、配偶、子女及其配偶等亲属和其他特定关系人谋求特殊待遇，情节严重的，给予撤销党内职务或者留党察看处分。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，参与利用宗教搞煽动活动的，给予严重警告处分。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，党员违背社会公序良俗，在公共场所有不当行为，造成不良影响的，给予警告或者严重警告处分。___

临时出国（境）团（组）或者人员中的党员，擅自延长在国（境）外期限，或者擅自变更路线的，对直接责任者和领导责任者，给予撤销党内职务处分。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，重要领导责任者是指在其职责范围内，对直接主管的工作不履行或者不正确履行职责，对造成的损失或者后果负直接领导责任的党员领导干部。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，直接经济损失，是指与违纪行为有直接因果关系而造成财产损失的实际价值。___

根据《中国共产党纪律处分条例》规定，计算经济损失的计算包括直接经济损失和间接经济损失。___

根据《中国共产党党内监督条例》的规定，党内监督要围绕统筹推进“五位一体”总体布局和协调推进“四个全面”战略布局。___

根据《中国共产党党内监督条例》的规定，党内监督必须贯彻民主集中制，依规依纪进行，强化自上而下的组织监督，改进自下而上的民主监督，发挥同级相互监督作用。___

根据《中国共产党党内监督条例》的规定，党内监督必须把纪律挺在前面，运用监督执纪“四种形态”，使党纪轻处分、组织调整成为违纪处理的常态。___

根据《中国共产党党内监督条例》的规定，领导干部应当按规定如实报告个人有关事项，及时报告个人及家庭重大情况，事先请示报告离开岗位或者工作所在地等。___

根据《中国共产党党内监督条例》的规定，党的各级纪律检查委员会是党内监督的专责机关，履行监督执纪问责职责，加强对所辖范围内党组织和领导干部遵守党章党规党纪、贯彻执行党的路线方针政策情况的监督检查。___

根据《中国共产党党内监督条例》的规定，审计机关发现党的领导干部涉嫌违纪的问题线索，应当向同级党组织报告，必要时向上级党组织报告，但不必将问题线索移送相关纪律检查机关处理。___

根据《中国共产党党内监督条例》的规定，在纪律审查中发现党的领导干部严重违纪涉嫌违法犯罪的，应当直接移送行政机关、司法机关处理。___

《关于实行党风廉政建设责任制的规定》适用于各级党的机关、人大机关、行政机关、政协机关、审判机关、检察机关的领导班子、领导干部。___

根据《关于实行党风廉政建设责任制的规定》的规定，实行党风廉政建设责任制，要坚持集体领导与个人分工负责相结合，谁主管、谁负责。___

根据《关于实行党风廉政建设责任制的规定》，党委（党组）应当建立党风廉政建设责任制的检查考核制度，建立健全检查考核机制，制定检查考核的评价标准、指标体系。___

根据《关于实行党风廉政建设责任制的规定》，党风廉政建设责任制的检查考核工作每半年进行一次。检查考核可以与领导班子、领导干部工作目标考核、年度考核、惩治和预防腐败体系建设检查工作等结合进行，也可以组织专门检查考核。___

根据《关于实行党风廉政建设责任制的规定》，追究集体责任时，领导班子主要负责人和直接主管的领导班子成员承担主要领导责任，参与决策的班子其他成员承担重要领导责任。对错误决策提出明确反对意见而没有被采纳的，不承担领导责任。___

根据《关于实行党风廉政建设责任制的规定》，实施责任追究不因领导干部工作岗位或者职务的变动而免予追究，但已退休的领导干部无须再进行相应的责任追究。___

根据中央八项规定实施细则，不在地方任职的中央政治局委员出席剪彩和奠基活动可以不经中央批准。___

“机不可失，时不再来”指的是___

是 ___

在客观规律面前，人的主观能动性表现在___

事物的联系和运动之间的关系___

唯物辩证法的总特征是___

___

“割下来的手就不再是人手”这句话体现了___

唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___

区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___

质量互变规律揭示了___

质和事物的存在是___

在实际工作中，要注意掌握分寸，防止“过”或“不及”，其关键在于___

区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___

量变的复杂性是指___

量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___

量变中的局部性部分质变是___

揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___

“肯定和否定相互渗透，在一定意义上，肯定就是否定。”这是一种___

事物的否定方面是指___

作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___

辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___

否定之否定规律___

事物发展的周期性体现了___

直线论的错误在于只看到___

循环论的错误在于___

对立统一规律揭示了___

唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___

辩证法所说的矛盾是指___

矛盾的基本属性是___

依据是___

矛盾问题的精髓是___

题的方法都是___

“任何个别（无论怎样）都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___

在唯物辩证法看来，水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___

“是就是是，不是就是不是，除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___

真象和假象的区别在于___

有的哲学家说，在大风扬起的尘土中，每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___

“或然率”是指___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___